Skip to content
Home » Federal Appeals Court Strikes Down FCC’s Net Neutrality Rules, Ending Two-Decade-Long Debate

Federal Appeals Court Strikes Down FCC’s Net Neutrality Rules, Ending Two-Decade-Long Debate

Washington, Jan. 2 (Reuters) – A federal appeals court has struck down the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) landmark net neutrality rules, marking a significant setback for efforts to regulate broadband providers and ensure equal internet access for all. The decision, handed down by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, concluded that the FCC lacked the legal authority to reinstate the rules, effectively ending a two-decade battle over the issue.

The court’s ruling referenced a Supreme Court decision from June, known as Loper Bright, which overturned a 1984 precedent that had granted federal agencies deference in interpreting laws they administer. In its opinion, the three-judge panel stated, “Applying Loper Bright means we can end the FCC’s vacillations.”

Table of Contents

The Net Neutrality Debate

Net neutrality rules, first introduced during the Obama administration in 2015, were designed to prevent internet service providers (ISPs) from blocking, throttling, or prioritizing certain online content. These regulations aimed to ensure an open and fair internet for consumers while avoiding special arrangements where ISPs could favor particular users or platforms with faster speeds.

The rules were repealed in 2017 under the Trump administration, sparking fierce partisan debate. Advocates, including tech giants like Google and consumer groups, argued that net neutrality protects innovation and free expression online. Opponents, led by ISPs and telecommunications companies, contended that the rules stifled investment and competition in the broadband sector.

A Blow to the Biden Administration

Restoring net neutrality was a key technology policy for the Biden administration. President Joe Biden’s 2021 executive order encouraged the FCC to reinstate the rules, and the commission voted along party lines in April 2024 to expand its oversight of broadband providers. However, industry groups, including USTelecom and major ISPs like AT&T and Verizon, filed lawsuits challenging the FCC’s authority.

The court’s decision to strike down the rules drew mixed reactions. FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel expressed disappointment, stating, “Consumers across the country have told us again and again that they want an internet that is fast, open, and fair. With this decision, it is clear that Congress now needs to heed their call, take up the charge for net neutrality, and put open internet principles in federal law.”

Meanwhile, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr, who voted against reinstating the rules, praised the ruling, describing it as a rejection of what he called Biden’s “internet power grab.” Former FCC Chair Ajit Pai also welcomed the decision, urging policymakers to focus on expanding internet access and fostering innovation.

State-Level Neutrality and Industry Reactions

Although federal net neutrality rules have been invalidated, state-level regulations remain in effect in places like California. Industry representatives hailed the court’s ruling as a victory. USTelecom, in a joint statement with other groups, said, “This decision is a win for American consumers that will lead to more investment, innovation, and competition in the dynamic digital marketplace.”

Advocates of net neutrality are expected to push for further legal reviews, including a potential appeal to the Supreme Court. Tech companies like Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Alphabet, which had supported the FCC’s rules, may also lobby for legislative action to codify open internet principles into federal law.

The Road Ahead

With the FCC’s authority limited and no immediate plans for an appeal by the Biden administration, the future of net neutrality in the U.S. appears uncertain. The ruling highlights the need for Congress to provide a clear legislative framework, as both supporters and opponents of the regulations call for decisive action to address the evolving dynamics of the internet.

As debates continue, the implications of this decision will likely shape the digital landscape for years to come, influencing consumer access, corporate competition, and the broader discourse on internet freedom.